Friday, 8 February 2013

Legal advice - copyright - Graphic Design Forum



General General Design Topics-No work requests in this forum, and no FREE requests or CONTESTS anywhere on this forum!!!

Old Yesterday, 09:16 PM ? #1

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 546

Legal advice - copyright


Hello!
Say for instance you took two photographs you found on the internet and took the head off one image and stuck it on the body of the other image, for comedic effect. Then put the image onto the public domain (internet messageboard) do you own the copyright?

What if that image was then printed in a national newspaper - are they allowed to do that without asking?

Kirby is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:22 PM ? #2

Wait, what?

?

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: St. Louis, MO

Posts: 6,160

To be sure, you'd need to discuss this with a lawyer. I am not a lawyer.

My opinion is that altering images you found online is theft and a violation of copyright. If the 'new' image fell under parody, you might have rights to it. If it did qualify as parody, no one else would have the right to use it without your permission.

Though it seems a little strange to get upset about someone stealing an image you stole in the first place.

__________________
"Do you want my leftover bacon?" Said no one ever.

KitchWitch is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:22 PM ? #3

Head Chee of Derpistan

?

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: St. Louis City, Missouri

Posts: 35,496

What does the messageboard's EULA, terms & conditions, etc., say about who owns posts?

As for 2 photos found on the internet, someone shot the photographs and owns them. They most likely at least are owed a credit cutline.

__________________

This post is brought to you by the letter E and the number 9. Those are the buttons I push to get a Twix out of the candy machine.
"I put my heart and my soul into my work, and have lost my mind in the process."

garricks is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:56 PM ? #4

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 546

I wasn't going to pursue it, nor am I upset about it. Was just wondering about the legalities of it all.
Created a photoshop for this site:
www.michelinguides.com

Woke up this morning to see it in The Sun Online:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...irl-guide.html

And in print:

I laugh just thinking that the poor girl guide next to Michel may have opened her paper this morning at breakfast and spat her cornflakes out when she saw her picture in it!

Kirby is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:22 PM ? #5

Will work for brains

?

Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: AK, New Zealand

Posts: 33,047

It seems like it's all very misguided and though you may have a parody case for your usage, the photographers of both original images would have a stronger case.

__________________
It is more fun to talk with someone who doesn't use long, difficult words but rather short, easy words like "What about lunch?" ? Winnie the Pooh

Buda is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:36 PM ? #6

Wait, what?

?

Join Date: Jul 2009

Location: St. Louis, MO

Posts: 6,160

If the photographers see it and decide to pursue it, I guess you'll know soon enough.

__________________
"Do you want my leftover bacon?" Said no one ever.

KitchWitch is online now ? Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:34 PM ? #7

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,597

I'm not a lawyer, but from what I've read about before, the only ones who own any copyright here are the original photographers.

__________________
"Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works."
-Steve Jobs

Sketcher is offline ? Reply With Quote
Old Today, 04:28 PM ? #8

Senior Member

?

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 29,798

If that's a National Enquirer type rag, they could easily fall into the Parody catagory.
Editorial rules are different from regular copyright rules. This may fall under editorial license more than parody. It also depends on if the original image was editorial or not.

You can't just go online and grab two photos and make a composite without first asking permission to use the photos. Any work you do after that, the only portion you would hold copyright to is anything added by you. If all you did was the composite, you would own none of it. It's like writing a book where you cite other sources. You own the part that is your observations, the cited part you do not own.

<Not a lawyer.

PrintDriver is offline ? Reply With Quote



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
?

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts


HTML code is Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 PM.



mediabistro creative network

GRAPHICS.COM NEWSLETTER
The weekly Graphics.com newsletter is a great way to stay up to date on what's new on the site and in the world of graphics. Subscribe ?

Source: http://www.graphicdesignforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=83481

st louis blues rueben randle mike trout ryan broyles jerel worthy alshon jeffery miami heat

No comments:

Post a Comment